SUTTA CUSTOMS AND AIRPORT POLICE ARE OVERCOME A BABY LOSTER SHIPPED TO BATAM AIRPORT.

Tangerang, INDONESIAPOS.NET.

In the baby lobster case, the judge is furious that the prosecutor is unable to bring the defendant to court. “This trial is governed by signals,” Judge Mangapul Girsang SH, SH, said at the Tangerang City District Court, Banten.

The presiding judge asked what the prosecutor was doing because the defendant couldn’t be brought into the courtroom. “We’re in this trial like idiots,” the presiding judge explained.

“If Americans are watching, Indonesia is experiencing decline.

I’m personally fed up with online trials, where I can’t gather information and the defendant can’t defend himself.

Amidst the enactment of the new Criminal Code, trials like this are becoming increasingly foolish, determined by the presiding judge’s signals.”

“Madam Prosecutor,” the defendant was not detained in this case because he was detained in another case. When will his detention expire?” “Let me issue a detention order before the defendant completes his current sentence.”

“In this case, the defendant has no prior history of detention,” said the second judge. Prosecutor Dela remained silent and refused to respond.

The presiding judge warned the prosecutor, “Prosecutors shouldn’t report to the hearing at 4:30. Do you live only to hear the hearing?”

“If you want to live to hear the hearing, we’re robots. I still have a family. I have to go home after work. If we live to hear the hearing, we’re robots,” said Mangapul Girsang.

Witness Royani, a member of the Indonesian National Police (Polri), who is the complainant in this case, was largely unaware of the defendant’s role and did not know the defendant.

According to Royani, during the trial, she received a report from the public that a shipment of baby lobsters was in the airport area, ready to fly.

This police witness conducted an investigation in the cargo area. At 12:30, information came from Batam. There was a shipment of lobster seeds to Jakarta Airport.

However, they were not found at Sutta Airport. The baby lobsters were found at Batam Airport by Batam Airport officers.

The sender was Dewi, a woman. What business did the sender, Dewi, have with the defendant Suhendra, asked the panel of judges, Girsang. The police witness, who was the complainant, could not Answer.

“The lobster seeds are already in the restricted flight area of ​​Sutta Airport. This location is completely sterile and cannot be entered by anyone except certain officers,” said the panel of judges.

How could they have gotten into such a sterile location? Who let them through extra-stretch, Customs supervision? This police witness remained silent.

The lobsters escaped Sutta Airport and were discovered to have arrived at Batam Airport.

The lobsters had experienced flying before being fried, said the panel.

The judge made the audience smile.

Witness Royani received information from the public that there was a shipment of lobsters to Sutta Airport, intended for shipment to Batam. However, the police and Customs were caught unawares because the lobsters still managed to fly to Batam.

The lobster shipment, as usual, used plastic bags filled with water and oxygen, then placed in large suitcases.

The witness did not know which country the lobsters were destined for.

The panel of judges asked where the lobster evidence was going.

The prosecutor answered. “Yes, sir. But I can’t prove where the evidence is.

“Chief Judge, if he’s arrested, it’s pointless! He’ll end up dead anyway,” said the panel of judges.

“If he’s arrested, rescued, and released into the sea, he can survive. If he dies, why arrest someone when the evidence dies anyway?”

“The baby lobster sender was Dewi, but the defendant, Rendra Setiawan, was not known,” witness Royani said.

The witness reported an incident involving the delivery of baby lobsters, disrupting the trial and stopping the defendant from disappearing from the TV monitor.

“Suddenly, there was a signal interruption. The defendant’s image disappeared from the TV monitor in the courtroom,” said the presiding judge.

“Rendra, in prison, could only answer yes. The prosecutor will still present one witness.

“Rendra Setiawan, also known as Ocen, will be released from his sentence on March 1, 2026,” said prosecutor Dela.

“After receiving the text message on his cell phone, I’ll make a note of it and detain him the day before his release,” said Mangapul.

Roynal Pasaribu, SH, the defendant’s attorney, stated outside the courtroom that the witness who filed the complaint only reported the delivery of the goods.

He didn’t report Rendra Carly. The recipient of the goods in Batam, Sakai, didn’t even know. Carly should have been arrested based on the address and phone number listed at the delivery address.

The witness couldn’t explain anything about the defendant’s involvement in this case.

Rendra was simply being used as a cover-up. There were no developments.

The owner of the goods and Dewi’s name were missing. Investigators didn’t investigate Dewi Carly’s whereabouts.

The owner of the shipping company should have been clear, but the police couldn’t develop any further information and sacrificed Rendra as a scapegoat.

In another courtroom, the panel of judges reprimanded the prosecutor for yawning when asked. “Sir,” he said. The prosecutor was actually sleepy.

The trial was held using a cell phone because the defendant had to be tried as his detention had entered its fifth month.

(PLAY)