PARHAT, A SADISTIC KILLER, HIS EX-GIRLFRIEND BEFORE THE EXECUTION, HIS HANDS WERE HANDCUFFS OWNED BY HER FATHER.

Tangerang, INDONESIAPOS.NET.

The trial for the murder of a woman whose throat was slit, her hands slit, and her body thrown into the bushes in Cibogo Village, Cisauk District, Tangerang Regency, Banten. The victim was found decomposing (July 16, 2025).

The defendant, Andi’s son, testified against defendants Parhat and Ibra. The trial was difficult because both Andi and Ibra denied any involvement in the premeditated murder committed by defendant Parhat.

The testimony of Andi’s underage son, who had already been sentenced to 9 years in prison, stated that he did not participate in stabbing the female victim or slitting her throat.

According to a police witness during the trial, the female victim was found dead in a dead state in the bushes.

The victim was still fully clothed, but her hands were handcuffed. It was discovered that the handcuffs used to bind the female victim belonged to Parhat’s parents.

Similarly, the defendant’s parents, who testified in the police brief, testified that the handcuffs belonged to them, as they were security guards in Jakarta.

The police witness confirmed in the courtroom that the victim was found dead and her hands were cuffed behind her back, according to the testimony of the perpetrators who handcuffed the defendant, Andi, a minor.

It was revealed in the testimony of the defendant, Andi’s son, who had already been sentenced to 9 years, that Andi was the perpetrator who handcuffed the victim’s hands.

During the trial, Andi’s son admitted to participating in the killing and stabbing.

However, in Parhat and Ibra’s testimony, Andi did not admit that Andi Parhat ordered Putri to participate in the murder, but she was told to tie her hands. She went back in a jacket Parhat had prepared.

Andi, the child witness, denied participating in the murder in front of prosecutor Martin, because during questioning by investigators, she was forced to sign a statement.

Parhat invited Andi to ride Ibra’s motorcycle together, promising him a job with the defendant Ibra.

Parhat called Putri and asked her to use Andi’s cell phone to come to Parhat’s house at 11 p.m. Upon arriving at Parhat’s house, Putri asked to collect a debt from her time together.

The victim arrived at Parhat’s house alone on a Vespa motorcycle. Upon arriving, a small altercation ensued because Putri was demanding a debt from Parhat’s ex-girlfriend.

Defendant Parhat was furious and punched Putri in the chest, causing her to fall. After the fall, Parhat covered her mouth with his sweater. Andi then tied the victim’s hands behind her back with handcuffs.

After Andi handcuffed Putri’s hands, he helped carry her to the side of the house. Parhat, Andi had run away out of fear. Curious, Andi peeked back through the gate of Parhat’s house.

Andi didn’t see Parhat execute the victim, stabbing and slashing the victim’s neck with a knife.

The defendant, Ibra, asked the police witness for evidence of the knife because it wasn’t found.

The police witness in court stated that they didn’t find any evidence of the knife Parhat used to execute the daughter.

The facts in the trial show that before the execution, the victim was handcuffed by the defendant Parhat with his father’s handcuffs to prevent him from resisting.

After being handcuffed, he was executed. In this case, the owner of the handcuffs, the defendant’s parents, was not a defendant.

He was only called a witness by police investigators. This is despite Article 55 requiring ownership of the handcuffs as evidence.

He should have been made a defendant more strongly than the owner of Ibra’s motorcycle.

For example, there was a case where a son shot someone using his father’s gun.

The owner of the gun (the father) was also held responsible in that case.

“Whereas in the case “This is the owner of the handcuffs to handcuff the victim so there would be no resistance and the victim could be executed freely, only as a witness,” said a court visitor, who felt there was something strange and odd about this case.

(play / iis)